The Sun Causes Lunar Tides

Lunar tides are caused by the sun and not by the moon.

Is it not a heresy to say that the moon’s gravitational pull, moves millions of tons of seawater (tides) from so far away a distance, were we all know, that the moon could not even hold its own atmosphere?

And likewise, why do satellites in zero gravity space orbit around the earth, do not also get pulled by the moon’s gravitational force when these satellites are much closer to the moon than the oceans are?

According to conventional science, the tides at a given place in the earth’s oceans occur about an hour later each day. Since the moon passes overhead about an hour later each day, it was long suspected that the moon was associated with the tides. The moon’s gravitational forces cause these movements of tides which became to be known as ‘Lunar Tides’.

But I disagree.

Because I believe, that what causes the tides is actually the sun and not the moon.

According to my theory of gravity, the atom at the outer layer plate (surface of the earth) is electrically positive and it is attracted to an inner plate, which is electrically negative, and this is what gravity is all about. The outer layer plate is showered by myriads of positive electrified particles radiated from the sun that sustain the atom’s positive charge of this outer plate.

Solar panel collectors work in a similar way, the more the sun shines on them the more energy these collectors can produce.

The same could be said regarding the oceans - the more the sun shines (radiating positive electrified particles) the more of positive charge the ocean’s atom gets – less shine, less charge.

The main chemical constituent of ocean seawater is salt. Its chemical name is sodium chloride, composed of ions, which offer a good electrical ‘conductor’.

Therefore, because the oceans are salty and they have a good electrical conductivity, their atoms can gain or lose their electrical charge easily. Waves and tides occur because of the increase or decrease of the electrical charge coming from the radiation of the sun. This depends on the fluctuation of time-shine between day and night.

Imagine the oceans are as if a balloon is held between our hands. If you apply pressure with one hand on an area (x) the balloon’s air travel away from area (x) to all directions and the balloon takes the shape of an oblong.


The same happens to the area (x) of the ocean where the sun shines mostly. The atoms in this region become more positively charged, than that of the other atoms that are further away. And because area (x) has now gained more positive charge, the attraction towards the inner negative plate is now much stronger and moves this part of the ocean closer to the seabed lowering the sea level, while at the same time pushing the surrounding seawater to all directions where the ocean atoms’ positive charge is weaker - sea currents are born.

By this hypothesis, one can conclude that it is the energy coming from the sun, that produces these movements of sea currents, which in turn create the waves and causes the tides.

Gravity Theory – Atom Positive not Neutral

Gravity is all about positive atoms and negative atoms attracting each other.

According to scientific books, an atom, no matter its physical anatomy, will always remain electrically neutral.

But I disagree.

Because I believe the atom is electrically positive and not neutral.

“Today’s assumption is tomorrow’s assignment”.

I wrote this saying in 1977 when I started to question myself about the possibility of harnessing gravitational forces as a new kind of energy source.

I kept this thought in mind to help me going while being aware of the great challenges lying ahead in tackling such a complex and controversial issue.

Following in the footsteps of Christopher Columbus I sailed on to discover the secrets of gravity. Yes, it all started with wishful thinking and so it is. Like it was to Columbus.

Now, try to imagine a world where electricity is freely available or very inexpensive to buy, by harnessing the gravitational forces, anywhere - even in a desert. What achievement this will be!

But first, let’s start with an assumption and figure out an idea which may lead us to discover the scientific knowledge of what gravity is all about.

As a ‘Faraday’ my explanations are in layman’s language. Equations and formulae will come at a later stage.

So, why do I consider that the atom at the surface of the earth is electrically positive?

1. As we all know our earth’s north and south poles are created by the electromagnetic field at the earth’s core. Similarly, I believe, our earth’s crust consists of another two-like poles (spherical plates): an outer layer plate and an inner layer plate, one above the other, with a dielectric (mantel) in between like a huge spherical capacitor - with the difference, that instead of magnetic poles we now also have two electrically charged plates, that covers the whole area of the earth: the inner plate’s atom, charged negative, and the outer plate’s atom, charged positive. These two plates attract each other and this is what gravity is all about, because positive and negative charges attract each other. We do not feel anything except the weight of our body, because we are also made of positive atoms like all the other matter that surrounds us. 2. It is a fact that most lightning strikes from the earth’s surface (outer plate) towards the clouds – and not as it is commonly believed – the other way round? When lightning strikes millions of positive volts are emitted from the outer plate and discharged to the clouds. Unfortunately, sometimes lightning strikes also through the underground telephone lines, pass the telephone receiver, spark out of the telephone handset, causing several fatal bodily incidents, deaths, and fire to buildings. This is proof that the earth’s surface is made of positively charged atoms.

3. It is a fact that our sun radiates myriads of positive electrified particles that shower the surface of the earth constantly, thus sustaining the atom’s positive charge. The Auroras at the North and South Poles are a physical and visual proof of these positive electrified particles.

4. It is a fact that the oceans are salty. Could it be for the same reason why corrosion (salt) accumulates around the positive terminal of a car battery? Is the earth like one gigantic electric cell?

Conclusion:

In my opinion, scientists build up all sorts of formulae and equations to hide their assumptions.

Labeling the atom, as being electrically neutral is one example – where they well know that a scientific experiment to proof the atom as electrically neutral does not exist!

Or are they just assuming that the atom is electrically neutral?

Gravity Theory – The Missing Link?

Do you know that with all the Hi-Tech available today, we still do not have a scientific proof of what gravity is all about?



Could both Einstein and Newton got it half-way wrong about gravity and we are stuck with their theories because academic institutions had nothing else to offer?

I consider myself as another Faraday.

It was in the year of 1990 when I first came round to write the definition of my theory on gravity.

Since then, my studies focused on viewing the National Geographic and Discovery TV channels while challenging my own theory as years went by. In the meantime, I continued my research work which included several experiments, pushing me one step forward every time.

Achieving levitation and harnessing gravitational forces are the central issues on my mind. But I cannot tease myself anymore and remain a one-man band.

I feel the need to share.

So, here is my theory (in a nutshell), hoping to attract as many bees as possible.

Let’s start with the earth’s core.

This creates a huge electromagnetic field, where as we all know, produces the North and South Poles. This electromagnetic field also produces electrical fields and in turn, electrical charges are formed which create electrical forces.

This is what gravity is all about: Electrically Charged Forces - ECF

Now, let us assume that earth is like a gigantic sphere capacitor. The earth’s core with its nuclear generator keeps our planet (huge capacitor) charged. The crust consists of three layers: an outer layer that is charged (+) positive; a mantel (middle) which serves as a dielectric; and an inner layer charged (-) negative.

It is a fact that positive and negative charges attract each other. Newton’s apple was attracted towards the inner (-) negative layer and NOT to the center of the earth as it is universally passed on to us.

Looking through this perspective it was not only the inner layer that pulled the apple but the attraction of two bodies which are the inner layer and the apple as being part of the outer layer - in other words, the attraction of two opposite ECF.

So, one can conclude that gravity as we know it, does not exist because according to conventional science, the force of gravity always attracts - never repels, and it is mostly associated with forces towards the centre of the planet. I believe this is the misleading part which makes gravitational forces still a phenomenon.

My conclusion stands, that the earth’s outer crust layer is attracted towards the inner crust layer and vice versa, whereas the ECF can now act as an attraction or repulsion.

This might be the key to open new horizons, and for scientists to rethink gravity. It will also open the possibilities for ‘Levitation’ and ‘Perpetual Motion’.

Traveling in outer space without the scientific knowledge of what gravity really is about is like a fish trying to swim on dry land.